7/10/2008 4:24 AM | |
Joined: 6/14/2008 Last visit: 1/25/2022 Posts: 65 Rating: (3) |
The program changed into S7 program from S5 program "CPU message" was seen. It was displayed. It was with"Event ID: 16# 4562" It checks. "OB121" is written in. It was made to operate anew. It was displayed. It was with"Event ID: 16# 2521" It checks. Although it seems that a problem is in FC52, where is a problem? The contents of a program are appended. Attachmentmelsec.pdf (702 Downloads) |
7/14/2008 6:35 PM | |
Joined: 6/14/2008 Last visit: 1/25/2022 Posts: 65 Rating: (3) |
Thank you for answering. My contents of investigation are appended. Attachmentmelsec0.pdf (421 Downloads) |
8/4/2008 2:33 AM | |
Joined: 6/14/2008 Last visit: 1/25/2022 Posts: 65 Rating: (3) |
About "MW248" Although "MW248" is used by the result of "Cross-reference" by "FC83 (16Bit Bin Multiply)" and "FC84 (16Bit Bin Division)" S7 program L 2 CALL FC 83 The state of "MW248" when operating this program was the same as that of "Z_1 :=MW10." Had the phenomenon with the same said of S5 occurred? S5 program In S5, even if it used "FB242", "FW248", "FW250", "FW252", and "FW254" had been independent. This S5 program is changed into S7 program by "Converting S5 Files" at a trial. S5 -- >S7 conversion program (IW32 is re-wiring to IW0) CALL FC 83 //; If a program is operated, "MW248", "MW250", "MW252", and "MW254" will be occupied by "FC83" like the first S7 program. The same phenomenon occurs. Where is the data about this phenomenon? Before, it is another affair. My understanding is lacking although it thinks that the answer at this time and this problem are related. please teach me....Thanks! |
Last edited by: melsec- at: 8/4/2008 2:39 AM |
|
Follow us on