9/28/2010 8:21 PM | |||||
Joined: 9/27/2006 Last visit: 1/15/2025 Posts: 12328 Rating: (2699)
|
Hello mohit; I cannot say about the hardware section, this you would need to check out by yourself, possibly using the Simatic Hardware Configurator from the Industry Mall: https://eb.automation.siemens.com/goos/WelcomePage.aspx?regionUrl=%2fuk&language=en - You will need a few WinCC Flexible licenses to operate a Runtime application. Start with the following manual that will explain the different licence levels and their application: http://support.automation.siemens.com/WW/view/en/18796010
https://eb.automation.siemens.com/goos/catalog/Pages/SearchResult.aspx?search=wincc%20flexible%20runtime&exact=n - You will also need the Software Redundancy package for S7-300(and manual): http://support.automation.siemens.com/WW/view/en/1137637
Hope this helps, Daniel Chartier |
||||
Last edited by: dchartier at: 9/28/2010 10:19 PMLast edited by: dchartier at: 9/28/2010 8:23 PM |
|||||
This contribution was helpful to1 thankful Users |
9/29/2010 12:41 AM | |
Joined: 7/2/2008 Last visit: 9/30/2024 Posts: 928 Rating: (309)
|
Hello mohit, Hello Daniel, 1-
Each station should have its own license and its own CP5611. 2- I hope you haven't forgotten your redundant link. It seems to me that you will build your redundant link over MPI and you will also use this subnet for communication with PCs, correct me if I'm wrong. It will work but you may suffer from slow communication over MPI. However, I don't think it will be a big problem since your project is relatively small. 3- You can use only one Red. bundle if you like. The IM153-2 HF supports up to 12 modules. 4- Check the numbers and types of Profibus connectors. I think you need4 more (2 for the PCs. and 2 for MPI ports on CPUs) Best regards. H-H |
Last edited by: H-H at: 9/29/2010 12:48 AM |
|
This contribution was helpful to1 thankful Users |
9/29/2010 1:24 PM | |
Joined: 10/7/2005 Last visit: 1/15/2025 Posts: 3029 Rating: (1058)
|
Hello mohit I can't tell you if a SWR (Software Redundancy) based system is good enough for your "very critical process" or not, I can tell you though that its redundancy is limited to the CPU's and the (Profi)bus (NO redundancy on the I/O level possible). If you can NOT tolerate process downtime (which is the message I'm getting from your post) a "High availability" S7-400 H system with (some or all) redundant I/O's would be the wiser (albeit dearer) choice. Hot swap support and being able to integrate safety into it are some other main benefits that set a S7-400H system apart from its Software redundancy based "poor cousin". I hope this helps |
Cheers |
|
This contribution was helpful to2 thankful Users |
Follow us on