11/15/2022 10:24 AM | |
Joined: 1/21/2013 Last visit: 9/13/2024 Posts: 3096 Rating: (483)
|
Sorry, wrong topic. Please follow the answer of itafusna below. Hi Claude, you can use a “device proxy PLC”. For more details take a look at the application example. Kind regards |
Last edited by: Stefan Arcularius at: 11/15/2022 10:36:16Changed because of wrong topic |
|
This contribution was helpful to1 thankful Users |
11/15/2022 10:25 AM | |
Joined: 2/17/2020 Last visit: 9/13/2024 Posts: 1059 Rating: (192) |
Hi Claude, If you are only going to communicate standard signals (tags), you can follow what is indicated in the following FAQ for the S7 connection: If you are going to communicate safety signals (tags), it will be necessary to follow what is indicated in the Safety Manual: Configuring and programming communication between S7-300/400 and S7-1200/1500 F-CPUs |
A rating will be well appreciated. |
|
This contribution was helpful to1 thankful Users |
11/15/2022 10:35 AM | |
Joined: 3/30/2020 Last visit: 9/13/2024 Posts: 4756 Rating: (977) |
Hello. Would you be satisfied to use PUT and GET? Review the article: How do you configure and program an S7 connection and the “PUT” and “GET” instructions for data transfer between two S7 CPUs? In essence you only need to configure and program the S7-1500. Make the configuration to an unknown device with the network credentials. This may be over Profibus or Profinet.. whichever can connect the two PLCs. The S7-300 is not secured to reject PUT and GET, so there is no changes needed there to make it work. -- with perhaps the exception that you may want to have some new DBs to link to, if these are not already there ~. |
Last edited by: qwazee at: 11/15/2022 10:36:33sorry for the overlap of information Activities of this user is voluntary. There is no obligation or liability placed on this user. Though optional, your 'please' and 'thank you' is highly valued. |
|
This contribution was helpful to1 thankful Users |
Follow us on