SiePortal

The integrated platform for your product selection, buying and support workflow - bringing together Industry Mall and Online Support.

Products & Services
- Menu temporary not available
- Menue temporary not available
- {{item.title}}
Support Support
{{(apiData.Support | filter:{'rank':1}:true)[0].title}} Support
- Menu temporary not available
- Menue temporary not available
- {{item.title}}
MySiePortal MySiePortal
{{(apiData.MySiePortal | filter:{'rank':1}:true)[0].title}} MySiePortal
- Menu temporary not available
- Menue temporary not available
- {{item.title}}
Cart ({{apiData.CartCount}})

Navigation

Max number of technological conditions in a transition of an SFC

1/9/2025 10:48 AM	Rate (0)
BYForever Joined: 11/28/2024 Last visit: 2/4/2025 Posts: 9 Rating: (0)	Greetings Experts, I would like to know if changing the max number of technological condition (1 by default) for one transition in an SFC is possible. Please kindly share your knowledge. Thank you. Edit: I just found out that you can just add an 'AND' or 'OR' function to have multiple conditions in that one technological condition..
	Last edited by: BYForever at: 01/09/2025 10:56:58 Last edited by: BYForever at: 01/09/2025 10:59:07
Suggestion To thank Quote Answer

1/9/2025 6:35 PM	Rate (1)
Oreca Platinum Expert Joined: 3/14/2008 Last visit: 9/3/2025 Posts: 2216 Rating: (985)	Hi, It is not possible to add more then one technological condition in a transition. I sent in a SR three years ago to make that possible. The downside of technological transitions is that there is a small non scalable windo where all the transitions are listed. You can use AND/OR and also nest them. It can get unreadable very quickly especially if you use NOT's in the logic. For one of our customers we now use a combination of technological and "regular" conditions. This will make it somewhat better to read for the operators.
	If I could help you, you can use the RATE button. Thank you. Prospact Netherlands...your PCS7 and PCS neo Expert Topic: PCS7 Complete Overview
Suggestion To thank Quote Answer
This contribution was helpful to 2 thankful Users Techno_Taru BYForever

1/10/2025 7:11 AM	Rate (0)
BYForever Joined: 11/28/2024 Last visit: 2/4/2025 Posts: 9 Rating: (0)	Thank you for the reply, Oreca. That's what I figured as well, shoving all of the necessary conditions into one technological condition, even though it is possible, seemed too clustered. Simple conditions that need not be nested would be better in normal conditions. Anyway, thanks again for the explanation.

Suggestion To thank Quote Answer

Share this page:

Share this page on...