5/2/2012 11:44 AM | |
Joined: 2/5/2009 Last visit: 11/8/2024 Posts: 36 Rating:
|
Hello, I'm trying implement a solution but I have some doubts on what is the best architecture. The solution consists of two separate systems, each has its controller and one controllers have a remote unit acquisition. In the HMI of each cabine is intended to show information on the two controllers. In the architecture option1 it's easy to do, i configure 2 connnections in HMI for each controller. In the architecture option2 it's more hard, because share information between the controllers using ethernet connection. What do I need to know is if the architecture of option 1 is correct or not. The architecures are in attach files. Someone can help me? Regards AttachmentArchitectures.zip (103 Downloads) |
5/2/2012 11:55 AM | |
Joined: 4/19/2008 Last visit: 11/21/2024 Posts: 1525 Rating:
|
Hello aaguiar, The Option 1 is Look ok, Everything on the Profinet, with fast Communication. & it is bit on higher side may be not sure comapre to Option 2. in option 2 Also you need to used the Switch between CPU 1 & 2 (Cabinet 1) |
Ammy |
|
5/2/2012 12:17 PM | |
Joined: 2/5/2009 Last visit: 11/8/2024 Posts: 36 Rating:
|
Hi Ammy, Thanks for your reply Other question? I will choose the option 1 It's necessary configure the scalances in hardware config in step7, i think this is necessary if i want diagnose in the scalances? The HMI support only ethernet not profinet, so my communications shoud be ethernet tcp/ip for all the devices, correct? In the slave ET200S i can communicate wtih ethernet? Thanks |
5/2/2012 12:32 PM | |
Joined: 3/21/2006 Last visit: 2/10/2025 Posts: 10239 Rating:
|
Answer of your questions is yes. Useful FAQs =Which PROFINET nodes support the extended PN diagnostics and what do you have to configure? Best regards, Hristo Mihalev
|
This contribution was helpful to
2 thankful Users |
Follow us on