Industry Online Support
Technical Forum
12/28/2011 9:19 AM | |
Posts: 140 Rating: (0) |
Hello Marciano, I am facing another issue, I did the same in the attached fucntion block, I cut the 4 Alarm Bits declared under TEMP and redifned them under STAT, however when I compile and download it into simulator I always receive SF indication. But once I again change back to the definition under TEMP that SF goes off. Please suggest if I need to follow any procedure to do that. Thanks in advance!
AttachmentFB61.pdf (67 Downloads) |
Last edited by: O_Moderator at: 12/28/2011 12:01 PMnew subject after splitting from /tf/WW/en/Posts/66718#top |
|
12/28/2011 1:33 PM | |
Joined: 9/8/2009 Last visit: 7/17/2023 Posts: 1410 Rating: (153) |
have you regenerated the instance datablock and also sent to plc? |
12/29/2011 9:04 AM | |
Joined: 1/28/2009 Last visit: 10/26/2024 Posts: 6852 Rating: (1365)
|
Dear Khyzer, Also reading these topics would be helpful: How do you update invalid block calls (time stamp conflicts) in calling blocks? How do you perform a block-consistency check following changes in the STEP 7 program? How do you create and update multiple instances? Best regards, Hamid Hosseini |
Follow us on