7/4/2017 7:58 AM |
|
Posts: 8946 Rating: (999) |
THAT is the deal, I think so! |
7/4/2017 11:45 AM | |
Posts: 42 Rating: (3) |
Hi David, roughly speaking, you have 10 reals (10*4 bytes), 3M samples that gives about 240MBytes of raw data.. this is a quite large amount perhaph you need a reliable logging system. The way you want to use data for post processing shoud be consideret to plan the way data will be collected and stored. For collecting data I would suggest by profinet and S7 protocol or modbus TCP protocol... There are different tools that are capable of read and store data for you at regular interval. For example give a try to this. More professional and generic (see reusable) software you sure can get using Modbus client. For Communication PC-PLC I'm using a S7 third party library and develop custom application using .NET Visual Studio and to store data i use SQLServer or SQLServerLite. It depends on the sight of your application.. maybe it should be a worse to develop a new app or use a simple testing tool? Please let us up to date on your advances. Bast recards, Luca. Thanks and ratings if helping is appreciated.
|
7/4/2017 9:14 PM | |
Posts: 20 Rating: (2) |
Hi all, Thanks for all your input. I discussed with the client today, and they had a idea that we could do daily reports to excel, but this feels for me like a bad idea, the test rig take several months for one test cycle so this would be a lot of excel files, and i could imagine that in the future the client wants to look at the data more than daily. I looked at your link lucavanzin about excel logging, and after some googling i find a german company that looks interesting www.plcreports.com/, i will contact them for more information about there product, they used as you wrote Profinet interface to read data. They have a license that is unlimited , feels like this is for me, maybe not for the wallet The plcreports company feels like an alternative if we choose to do the data logging "in house", but first we need to know the limitations and "how to do" about the software. The SQL alternative feels more "open" for in the future do what ever we want with the data, the key element feels like to get a good structure from the beginning or? |
7/5/2017 4:21 AM | |
Joined: 10/7/2005 Last visit: 11/5/2024 Posts: 3026 Rating: (1055)
|
Hello David arguably a biased suggestion, but have a look at what iba AG has to offer, especially in form of their ibaPDA-S7-Xplorer preferably in combination with ibaHD-Server and certainly together with the free or charge ibaAnalyzer. |
Cheers |
|
7/11/2017 5:20 PM | |
Posts: 20 Rating: (2) |
Hi all, Some update about the project. Fritz, thanks for the tip about Iba software, i will Contact them for further information. I haved contacted PLC Reports and it looks intresting, you pay for the quantity of varibles you want to logg, so in this case we will pay a license for 10 varibles. The software has watchdog function and able to write to PLC:s tags. It will be intresting to compare this to the Iba software. We have also contacted Omron, they have in their PLC:s direct acess to SQL database via the built in Ethernet/IP port, so if we go the SQL way maybe their solution is a alternative, but then we still need a .NET Consultant. It all depends on how the client want thier data structured, so it take some more meetings to clear this out. About the PLC hardware im thinking the: SIMATIC ET 200SP OPEN CONTROLLER, CPU 1515SP PC F + HMI 2048PT https://mall.industry.siemens.com/mall/en/WW/Catalog/Product/6ES7677-2FA41-0FM0 It feels like it has all the ingredients for the Projects, with safety and even if will be a SQL solution or Excel sloution this PLC would do the job. Compared to the Omron the Siemens was cheaper and you get "all in one box". |
Follow us on