9/5/2014 4:44 AM | |
Joined: 10/7/2005 Last visit: 6/9/2023 Posts: 2969 Rating:
|
Hello andrew_pj its always been like that for the ET200S and the corresponding information is in the manuals (e.g. SIMATIC ET 200S distributed I/O Digital electronic module 8DI DC24V (6ES7131-4BF00-0AA0), but you are not the first one to fall into that "trap" if that is of any consolation). Solutions are to either physically rewire the ET200Sor to do a software "rewire" of your S7 program. I hope this helps |
Cheers |
|
This contribution was helpful to
2 thankful Users |
9/5/2014 5:44 AM | |
Joined: 11/21/2007 Last visit: 6/1/2023 Posts: 2321 Rating:
|
Hello andrew_pj Don't worry, you are not alone in this. Many people make this mistake, the first time that they use ET200S 8DI / 8DO Modules . I have often wondered, why such a confusing terminal numbering has been use. Probably a design limitation. I must admit that I had also made the same mistake the first time we used these modules. Fortunately it was detected during factory testing stage and could be easily rectified. The easiest and the best solution is usually to change the wiring.That was you just need to change the module Pin Nos. on the drawings ( And maybe the ferrules ). Cheers Navnag |
Last edited by: Navnag at: 9/5/2014 5:46 AMThere is no such thing as the last bug in a program |
|
This contribution was helpful to
1 thankful Users |
9/5/2014 6:13 AM | |
Posts: 30 Rating:
|
Dear fritz, Thank you for the documentation link. I think physical rewiring might be fine in my case as only using few modules. Best regards, Andrew
|
9/5/2014 6:16 AM | |
Posts: 30 Rating:
|
Dear Navnag, Thank you for your reply. Yes, I agree rewiring might be the best solution as it is already mentioned in documentation. This seems like a 'prank' by Siemens. Best regards, Andrew |
This contribution was helpful to
1 thankful Users |
Follow us on