6/22/2009 6:55 PM | |
Posts: 15 Rating:
|
Dear Friends, I have gone through lot of FAQs and manuals but i have not gota clear YES/NO from any one hence putting this thread. Please check the attached configuration and let me know if it will work or not. Basically i m trying to connect a few PA instruments (PTs) to software redundant 300R system (315-2DP). Every body knows that 6ES7-153-2BA02works with ET200M in software redundancy butcan itbe used for DP/PA link as well with software redundancy! Thanks and regards, AttachmentDPPA_300R.pdf (350 Downloads) |
6/23/2009 6:53 AM | |
Joined: 10/7/2005 Last visit: 6/5/2023 Posts: 2966 Rating:
|
Hello sameer248 interesting proposition that you have come up with. I can't see any problems with your configuration and say it will not onlyhave to work butis(should be) also an officially supported design. As you already know, S7-300 software redundancy supports (requires) two IM153-2 per ET200M station (and don't forget the active backplane modules). This setup is also no different to what is called "single channel, switched ET20M I/O's" inan S7-400H system. Moving on to using the a pair of IM153-2 asa (redundant) DP/PA link: Note firstly thatthe (redundant) Profibus DP side is the same as above. Note secondly that the IM153-2 creates a 45.45 kbps profibus DP segment on the "backplane" to which you can connect up to 5 PA couplers. Note thirdly that the PLC HWconfig does not concern itself with how many PA couplers exists, nor does it "care" if you use coupler redundacy via AFD's or AFS. Note fourthly that the PA ring redundancy is handled on a hardware level viathe AFD's or AFS (there is nothing to configure). Conclusion,your design is ok and will work (and I am confident that Siemens will one day ammend the manuals to showS7-400H's as well as a Software redudant S7-300's in their example pictures). I hope this helps Cheers Fritz |
Cheers |
|
6/23/2009 9:06 PM | |
Joined: 7/2/2008 Last visit: 3/14/2023 Posts: 928 Rating:
|
Hello Fritz, I've been searching for a while. The software redundancyhardware listhasn't been updated since the year 2003. Only ET200M can be used for software redundancy. Onlysignal modules, FM350 and CP341 are listed under usable module for ET200M. Now I claim that these statements are little old and should have been changed since ET200 iSP can work with software redundancy (according to ET200iSP manual). MaybeDP/PA couplers can work although they are not listed. The point is that I also checked the DP/PALink manualand this statement is still there, DP/PA Link |
6/24/2009 2:27 AM | |
Joined: 10/7/2005 Last visit: 6/5/2023 Posts: 2966 Rating:
|
Hello H-H I concur with everything you stated and believe that this is exactlythe "problem" that sameer248 has(i.e. there is no offical statement in the (ancient) SWR manuals nor any deliberate refercence to SWR usage case in the manusl that haveH systems listed as usage cases forY-Link and/or PA ring redundancy). Since SWR and H systems arehowever really no different from each other when it comes to handling a redundant IM153-2 pair, everything connected "downstream" of the redundant IM153-2 pair (e.g. Y-Link, PA Ring with two couplers etc.) must work with bith and shouldbe supported by Siemens (and ideally manuals should list them both). In other words, just because Siemens has "neglected" to update the SWR manuals and has a tendency to "ignore" SWR and only lists H systems in the product manuals for the redundant usage cases of IM153-2's does not mean that it is NOT offically suported by Siemens. Lastely, I may of course stand corrected on my assertions andsameer would be well advised to send an official enquiryto Siemens service and support to seek clarfication (and escalate it to the product mangers should they be unable to give a clear answer which is what I fear will happen). Cheers Fritz |
Cheers |
|
This contribution was helpful to
1 thankful Users |
6/30/2009 11:29 AM | |
Joined: 10/7/2005 Last visit: 6/5/2023 Posts: 2966 Rating:
|
Thnaks sameer248, so much for my statement "Y-Link, PA Ring with two couplers etc. must work with SWRand shouldbe supported by Siemens .." Anyway, I'm glad you checked this with the "authorities", but my question is: Did Siemens give you a technical explanation as to the nature of why "The results are not good. An error free work was usually not possible"? (If so please post it as I would really like to know). |
Cheers |
|
6/30/2009 1:49 PM | |
Posts: 15 Rating:
|
Hey fritz! No additional info given by A&D. Do not want to follow this issue any further with A&D Cheers! |
Follow us on