8/24/2016 12:39 PM | |
Joined: 9/27/2006 Last visit: 3/23/2025 Posts: 12344 Rating:
|
Hello Dren; The USS protocol was originally offered as an (external) library for the S7-200 CPUs, so that they could control Siemens drives without being Profibus-DP masters. In Siemens' corporate vision of the time, Siemens drives should communicate through Profibus whenever possible. So the USS protocol was never developed for the S7-300, as Modbus was. I know there were some attempts in developing it for CP 341, you can search fr them on the forum, but I am not sure any of them were successful. For all later families (S7-1200, S7-1500), the USS protocol is available. And also for the ET 200S 1SI serial modules. What changes do you have to make in the sample program 'USS Protocol' in order to operate multiple slaves on the ET 200S 1SI module? https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/26513380 If you want to communicate with a Baumueller drive with a S7-300, you can either choose one of their Profibus-DP modules 9if your CPU is a Profibus master) or you could place a small ET 200S coupler (over Profibus) or CPU , including a 1SI module, and implement USS on that unit, as suggested in the FAQ above Hope thos helps, Daniel Chartier |
This contribution was helpful to
3 thankful Users |
8/27/2016 3:39 PM | |
Joined: 9/27/2006 Last visit: 3/23/2025 Posts: 12344 Rating:
|
Hello Dren; First of all, notice in your screenshot that the protocols supported by each version of the 1SIO modules is not the same; there are only 4 that support USS, and they give you a choice of 4 or 8 bytes interface. The choice between the 4/8 byte interface is explained in the following document, and shown in my attachment below: Operating instructions:SIMATIC ET 200S Serial interface modules https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/9260793 Basically, selecting 4 or 8 bytes interface determines how many bytes are transferred over USS at every transmission cycle; this is a choice that involves a compromise for your project: 8 bytes interface is faster (larger "throughput" per transmission) but requires more I/O space when you configure your ET 200S rack. This is your own choice, based on your requirements and the number of I/O modules in the rack. Hope this helps, Daniel Chartier |
Last edited by: dchartier at: 8/27/2016 3:43:41 PM |
|
This contribution was helpful to
2 thankful Users |
Follow us on