Industry Online Support
Technical Forum
2/3/2010 7:09 AM | |
Joined: 10/7/2005 Last visit: 9/25/2024 Posts: 3022 Rating: (1054)
|
Hello IrVin_Chan you'd be greatly reducing the number of FC261 (or now FB23) parameters, so this will in generalhave a positive impact on the overall FC222(or now FB22) memory requirements. Having said that there are also subtle differencesconcerning the Parameter passing memory "consumption" between FC and FB callsand Multi Instance calls are slighly different again from this so my advise is: Do the changes and see what you come up with. One last thing, I have not checked/evaluated the functionality of your logic. What I mean by that is that I don't know if you really need all these FC261 calls (or what exactly the logic is trying to do). Perhaps there are far easier ways (or other less memory consuming ones) to program the functionality that you need to have which would be another way of overcoming the problem. I hope this helps |
Cheers |
|
Follow us on