4/28/2020 10:17 AM | |
Joined: 2/5/2013 Last visit: 4/25/2024 Posts: 320 Rating: (74) |
Hi AlanGarde , Don't worry there is no any network is corrupted. Open Particular FC 1.Press Ctrl +1 to View all networks in LAD (except code which written in STL) 2.Press Ctrl +2 to View all networks in STL 3.Press Ctrl +3 to View all networks in FBD (except code which written in STL) In LAD block if we add some STL network by changing view to STL then these newly added networks can not be viewed again LAD if we press Ctrl +1. (It has some exceptions also) Br, AmolG. |
Last edited by: AmolG at: 04/28/2020 10:23:29Please rate it. |
|
4/29/2020 5:01 AM | |
Joined: 5/26/2016 Last visit: 2/7/2024 Posts: 7 Rating: (0) |
Hi Sachin, I have found there was a network in the FC that had been created in LAD, but somehow was now in STL with reference to L71.0. This was present for a few iterations of the project, but it may have been the first time that FC211 had been edited since that occurred. A colleague tells me that he has had his LAD corrupted like this when he has changed the TEMP variable area while there is an explicit access to the Local variables used by the PG. The biggest flaw I can see though is that the compare ONLINE/OFFLINE does not pick this up, even when "Execute Code Comparison" is selected - it just responds "The comparison of the blocks did not produce any time stamp deviations". It was only when I uploaded the FC211 to FC199 and compared those that the comparison showed a difference ! It could be damaging to the plant if a download had been executed before I noticed the corruption ! See attached file for the comparison results. AttachmentBPM951_LADCompares.pdf (49 Downloads) |
Last edited by: AlanGarde at: 04/29/2020 05:07:03 |
|
Follow us on