3/26/2020 6:53 PM | |
Joined: 12/16/2018 Last visit: 6/16/2024 Posts: 67 Rating: (0) |
Hi Heisenberg2 I would be very grateful if you received a reply from them and let me know
Also i have same problem in the PCS7 v9.0 SP1. Best regard AttachmentImages.zip (67 Downloads) |
Last edited by: amirab at: 03/26/2020 20:36:21 |
|
3/30/2020 7:57 AM | |
Joined: 5/3/2017 Last visit: 5/21/2024 Posts: 673 Rating: (217) |
Hi amirab, sorry for the late response.
I wanted to keep it as simple as possible and not implement the full functionality and make it confusing. So i can show you that the you have to connect the two connections for the jump from the PIDConL to ConPerMon and back.
The Uncertain-Process sign is active because I didn't connect all the necessary connections between PIDConL and ConPerMon, so the ConPerMon hasn't all the needed information. Did you perform all the steps to implement and initialize the ConPerMon as described in the manual PCS 7 Advanced Process Library at section Configuration?
3. I performed the jump from the PIDConL to the ConPerMon and from the ConPerMon back to the PIDConL and it works as expected. I tested all with PLCSIM.
Did you have compile and load the AS or PLCSIM? And have you compile and load the OS? With regards |
This contribution was helpful to1 thankful Users |
4/1/2020 11:37 AM | |
Joined: 12/16/2018 Last visit: 6/16/2024 Posts: 67 Rating: (0) |
Hi Heisenberg2 Yes, I did the steps mentioned in the APL v8.2 document and pages 507-509 The APL Library template I use also has this uncertain situation too. The same thing happens with pcs7 v9 sp1 as well as compiling AS and OS, but the problem still exists In general, I have to abandon the use of this block however thanks for all your tips and guidance. Best regard |
This contribution was helpful to1 thankful Users |
Follow us on