SiePortal

The integrated platform for your product selection, buying and support workflow - bringing together Industry Mall and Online Support.

Products & Services
- Menu temporary not available
- Menue temporary not available
- {{item.title}}
Support Support
{{(apiData.Support | filter:{'rank':1}:true)[0].title}} Support
- Menu temporary not available
- Menue temporary not available
- {{item.title}}
MySiePortal MySiePortal
{{(apiData.MySiePortal | filter:{'rank':1}:true)[0].title}} MySiePortal
- Menu temporary not available
- Menue temporary not available
- {{item.title}}
Cart ({{apiData.CartCount}})

Navigation

Cross Reference addressing problem

5/8/2014 3:08 PM	Rate (0)
Inugami Posts: 27 Rating: (0)	Dear All, In the Cross Reference (Step7) some variables’ addresses are not assigned their accrual symbols. For example, I have DB1.DBX1.1 “Variable1”. But the CR displays ”Variable2” at this address instead. The other S7 projects are displayed fine. How can I fix it? Thanks in advance and Best Reagrds!
Inugami Posts: 27 Rating: (0)
Suggestion To thank Quote Answer

5/10/2014 10:41 AM	Rate (0)
Sachinpatke Posts: 623 Rating: (77)	Dear Inugami, Have you generated the data again. See below the image. Attachment ref_data.JPG (346 Downloads)
Sachinpatke Posts: 623 Rating: (77)
Suggestion To thank Quote Answer
This contribution was helpful to 2 thankful Users Inugami liew

5/10/2014 5:44 PM	Rate (0)
SolutionFinder Posts: 559 Rating: (87)	Inugami Dear All, In the Cross Reference (Step7) some variables’ addresses are not assigned their accrual symbols. For example, I have DB1.DBX1.1 “Variable1”. But the CR displays ”Variable2” at this address instead. The other S7 projects are displayed fine. How can I fix it? Thanks in advance and Best Reagrds! Please check the symbol table for the both project. That must be different.
SolutionFinder Posts: 559 Rating: (87)
Suggestion To thank Quote Answer

5/10/2014 6:47 PM	Rate (0)
@shish Posts: 291 Rating: (6)	Will you please upload the screenshot of your symbol table, where DB1.DBX1.1 is. also the screenshot of when you search the address. I guess there is some misunderstanding.
@shish Posts: 291 Rating: (6)
Suggestion To thank Quote Answer

5/12/2014 12:12 PM	Rate (0)
Inugami Posts: 27 Rating: (0)	Thank you very much, regeneration of the reference data helped.
Inugami Posts: 27 Rating: (0)
Suggestion To thank Quote Answer
This contribution was helpful to 1 thankful Users SolutionFinder

8/14/2015 9:37 AM	Rate (0)
Min_Moderator Posts: 4758 Rating: (122)	New question published by Shahjee is split to a separate thread with the subject Addresses without cross references. Best regards Min_Moderator
Min_Moderator Posts: 4758 Rating: (122)
Suggestion To thank Quote Answer

Share this page:

Share this page on...