Skip to Content

Register Login

Industry Online Support

Technical Forum

Navigation

TDC and WINCC communication problems

Created by: xxkj at: 3/23/2017 3:42 PM (4 Replies)

Rating (0)

Thanks 1

5 Entries

3/23/2017 3:42 PM	Rate (0)
xxkj Member Joined: 4/23/2016 Last visit: 2/27/2021 Posts: 4 Rating: (0)	Dear ALL TDC side use CP5100 WINCC 7.0.3 Communication driver use TDC PMC TCP/IP V7.0 Someone can tell me what it means, how to solve it, thank you very much PMC Diagnosis log as follows ： 2017-03-20 21:33:32,089 NONE CHN_JOB, Line 1897: [COMFU901] SD-Var. FP_CO_CC_HM_HMI3/WB130.Y invalid! 2017-03-20 21:33:32,089 NONE CHN_JOB, Line 1897: [COMFU901] SD-Var. FP_CO_CC_HM_HMI3/LC16.Y invalid! 2017-03-20 21:33:32,089 NONE CHN_JOB, Line 1897: [COMFU901] SD-Var. FP_CO_CC_HM_HMI3/CCC01.X05 invalid! 2017-03-20 21:33:32,089 NONE CHN_JOB, Line 1897: [COMFU901] SD-Var. FP_CO_CC_HM_HMI3/TOHP2.Y invalid! 2017-03-20 21:33:32,089 NONE CHN_JOB, Line 1897: [COMFU901] SD-Var. FP_CO_CC_HM_HMI3/WB225.Y invalid! 2017-03-20 21:33:32,089 NONE CHN_JOB, Line 1897: [COMFU901] SD-Var. FP_CO_CC_HM_HMI3/CHP05.Y invalid! 2017-03-20 21:33:32,090 NONE CHN_JOB, Line 1897: [COMFU901] SD-Var. FP_CO_CC_HM_HMI3/LC20.Y invalid! 2017-03-20 21:47:10,719 NONE CHN_JOB, Line 1716: [STAND006] Ignoring CYCLE-RJob data! 2017-03-20 21:47:38,859 NONE CHN_JOB, Line 1716: [STAND004] Ignoring CYCLE-RJob data! 2017-03-20 21:54:43,618 NONE CHN_JOB, Line 1716: [STAND006] Ignoring CYCLE-RJob data! 2017-03-20 21:54:43,804 NONE CHN_JOB, Line 1716: [STAND006] Ignoring CYCLE-RJob data! 2017-03-20 21:57:54,688 NONE CHN_JOB, Line 1716: [STAND006] Ignoring CYCLE-RJob data! 2017-03-20 21:57:55,999 NONE CHN_JOB, Line 1716: [STAND006] Ignoring CYCLE-RJob data! 2017-03-20 21:58:08,853 NONE CHN_JOB, Line 1716: [STAND006] Ignoring CYCLE-RJob data!

Suggestion To thank Quote Answer

5/9/2017 8:00 PM	Rate (0)
lmorais Member Joined: 5/20/2010 Last visit: 9/30/2020 Posts: 1 Rating: (0)	Dear friend, I have the same problem. Did you find any solution? Regards, Luciano

Suggestion To thank Quote Answer

1/20/2019 1:31 PM	Rate (0)
xxkj Member Joined: 4/23/2016 Last visit: 2/27/2021 Posts: 4 Rating: (0)	Basically solved

Suggestion To thank Quote Answer

2/26/2021 5:05 PM	Rate (0)
Leonardo_Tan Regular Member Joined: 2/27/2016 Last visit: 4/20/2021 Posts: 2 Rating: (0)	Could you let us know how you fixed it? Thanks.

Suggestion To thank Quote Answer

2/27/2021 4:19 AM	Rate (0)
xxkj Member Joined: 4/23/2016 Last visit: 2/27/2021 Posts: 4 Rating: (0)	Leonardo_Tan Could you let us know how you fixed it? Thanks. SER02-CI-VC-VI-VM-MM_LI Put these functional blocks in a shorter scan cycle； Refer to the following instructions： - All HMI function blocks have to be calculated <= 64ms - Run sequence of HMI function blocks have to be SER02-CI-VC-VI-VM-MM_LI - Function block SER02 is located in CFC-chart CPUSER - Please check for HMI performance problems: (10/cycle_time_HMI_function_blocks[s]) > (TRY/SUC-connector from LI-block) Example: Cycle_Time_HMI_function_blocks=64ms (10/0.064)=156 TRY/SUC connector of LI-block have to be smaller than 156!!

Suggestion To thank Quote Answer
This contribution was helpful to 1 thankful Users Jen_Moderator

|

Share this page:

Share this page on...

Follow us on