Skip to Content

SiePortal

The integrated platform for your product selection, buying and support workflow - bringing together Industry Mall and Online Support.

SiePortalDeutsch

Search

Home
Support Support
{{(apiData.Support | filter:{'rank':1}:true)[0].title}} Support
- Menu temporary not available
- Menu temporary not available
- Menue temporary not available
- {{item.title}}

Products & Services
- Menu temporary not available
- Menue temporary not available
- {{item.title}}
Support Support
{{(apiData.Support | filter:{'rank':1}:true)[0].title}} Support
- Menu temporary not available
- Menue temporary not available
- {{item.title}}
MySiePortal MySiePortal
{{(apiData.MySiePortal | filter:{'rank':1}:true)[0].title}} MySiePortal
- Menu temporary not available
- Menue temporary not available
- {{item.title}}
Cart ({{apiData.CartCount}})

Navigation

network design output control

Created by: AutoGen_5000602 at: 2/1/2024 6:44 AM (14 Replies)

Rating (0)

Thanks 3

Result pages:: |; 1 | 2; |

15 Entries

Entries per page: 10 | all

2/1/2024 6:44 AM	Rate (0)
AutoGen_5000602 Joined: 1/2/2023 Last visit: 7/10/2025 Posts: 14 Rating: (0)	1-when controlling output q1 in logo/192.168.0.2/ via network output nq2/192.168.0.2/, the red operation indication q1-test in simulation does not appear 2-if the project contains the graphic symbol q1, then vb1064.0 is 0 Attachment logo1.jpg (380 Downloads)

Suggestion To thank Quote Answer

2/1/2024 6:49 AM	Rate (0)
ixo65 Grandmaster Joined: 12/18/2014 Last visit: 9/2/2025 Posts: 35912 Rating: (4496)	If an output (Q1 in your case) in the diagram on the input side is connected to logic, this output cannot be switched remotely. Bit V1064.0 is only an image of the state of Q1 and is not used for switching, but only for display.

Suggestion To thank Quote Answer

2/1/2024 7:23 AM	Rate (0)
AutoGen_5000602 Joined: 1/2/2023 Last visit: 7/10/2025 Posts: 14 Rating: (0)	3 - if we remove the q1 symbol in the project, the table shows the correct situation v1064.0=1 4-if we remove the q1 symbol in the project, the table shows the correct situation v1064.0=1 why is this happening? where is the mistake? Attachment logo4.jpg (372 Downloads)
	Last edited by: AutoGen_5000602 at: 02/01/2024 16:38:50
Suggestion To thank Quote Answer

2/1/2024 7:25 AM	Rate (0)
ixo65 Grandmaster Joined: 12/18/2014 Last visit: 9/2/2025 Posts: 35912 Rating: (4496)	AutoGen_5000602 3 - jeśli usuniemy w projekcie symbol q1, tabela pokazuje prawidłową sytuację v1064.0=1 [snip] ???

Suggestion To thank Quote Answer

2/1/2024 8:11 AM	Rate (0)
qwazee Platinum Member Joined: 3/30/2020 Last visit: 9/2/2025 Posts: 5416 Rating: (1063)	The way Q3 is connected in the right hand project is correct. The output is not meant to be manipulated directly without making any program connection. Not connecting to Q1 in the right hand project is not the prescribed way of working. The representation of the inputs/outputs in the V-memory is read only. The V-memory does not meant override the inputs/outputs as you wish for. There is the possibility of making a LOGO a slave device. Then the LOGO does not contain a program. It is then only a terminal for remote inputs/outputs. Would this suit your situation better?
	Activities of this user is voluntary. There is no obligation or liability placed on this user. Though optional, your 'please' and 'thank you' is highly valued.
Suggestion To thank Quote Answer

2/1/2024 8:20 AM	Rate (0)
ixo65 Grandmaster Joined: 12/18/2014 Last visit: 9/2/2025 Posts: 35912 Rating: (4496)	AutoGen_5000602 [snip] 4-if we remove the q1 symbol in the project, the table shows the correct situation v1064.0=1 why is this happening? where is the mistake? Because you are working in the simulation and not in a real LOGO!.

Suggestion To thank Quote Answer
This contribution was helpful to 1 thankful Users qwazee

2/1/2024 12:23 PM	Rate (0)
Jen_Moderator Diamond Member Joined: 6/19/2017 Last visit: 9/6/2024 Posts: 8171 Rating: (174)	AutoGen_5000602 3 - jeśli usuniemy w projekcie symbol q1, tabela pokazuje prawidłową sytuację v1064.0=1 4-if we remove the q1 symbol in the project, the table shows the correct situation v1064.0=1 why is this happening? where is the mistake? Hello AutoGen_5000602, Please try to discuss your question in English language. This is an international community, and we try to focus on one language. Posting in English will help you to get more response to your question. This is the translation of your post: AutoGen_5000602 3 - if we remove the q1 symbol in the project, the table shows the correct situation v1064.0=1 4-if we remove the q1 symbol in the project, the table shows the correct situation v1064.0=1 why is this happening? where is the mistake? Regards, Jen_Moderator

Suggestion To thank Quote Answer

2/1/2024 4:39 PM	Rate (0)
AutoGen_5000602 Joined: 1/2/2023 Last visit: 7/10/2025 Posts: 14 Rating: (0)	sorry, I corrected it

Suggestion To thank Quote Answer
This contribution was helpful to 1 thankful Users Jen_Moderator

2/1/2024 4:56 PM	Rate (0)
AutoGen_5000602 Joined: 1/2/2023 Last visit: 7/10/2025 Posts: 14 Rating: (0)	vm bit table shows that bit vb1024.0 was set =1 if the diagram on the right side did not contain outq1 this experiment conflicts with your thesis that byte vb1024 is only an image and cannot be written also in the ethernet output menu there is an item q What do you think? Attachment IMG_0448.JPG (341 Downloads)

Suggestion To thank Quote Answer

2/1/2024 5:05 PM	Rate (0)
ixo65 Grandmaster Joined: 12/18/2014 Last visit: 9/2/2025 Posts: 35912 Rating: (4496)	I think that you don't want to accept that you cannot write to this memory area in a real LOGO, only the operating system of the LOGO! can do that. If you have a different opinion, please feel free to do so. But then don't be surprised if I don't answer anymore.

Suggestion To thank Quote Answer

|

Share this page:

Share this page on...

Related topics by keywords:

Follow us on