1/13/2019 7:21 PM | |
Posts: 25 Rating: (0) |
Hi I want to buy 414 -5h cup Is s7-300 analog and digital input/output modules can be installed or it is better to install s7-400 I/o modules Of course sm 321 is cheaper than sm 421 And sm 322 cheaper than sm 422 and so on Thanks ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
Last edited by: Jen_Moderator at: 1/14/2019 8:18:53 AMNew subject after splitting |
|
1/14/2019 12:56 PM | |
Joined: 9/27/2006 Last visit: 11/16/2024 Posts: 12294 Rating: (2691)
|
Hello hussein; You can use S7-300 I/O modules with a S7-400H CPUs if you set them up as Profibus or Profinet nodes. That means you install the I/O modules with IM 153-2 head module for Profibus or IM 153-4 for Profinet. Important information on installing these nodes with a S7-400H systems will be found in the S7-400H Fault-tolerant system manual: https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/us/en/view/82478488 Hope this helps, |
1/14/2019 11:11 PM | |
Posts: 25 Rating: (0) |
Thanks But I still ask if installing sm 421 better than sm 321 in s400-H ? Why sm 321 is cheaper than sm 421 ? Thanks |
1/15/2019 2:34 PM | |
Joined: 9/27/2006 Last visit: 11/16/2024 Posts: 12294 Rating: (2691)
|
Hello hussein; First of all, you seem to always ask the same question, so let's have you answer one for a change. Is this a research for an actual project, or simply to educate yourself? If you are planning to use the S7-414-5H in a redundant, fault-tolerant pair, then the I/O modules in the configuration must be S7-300 modules mounted in a Profibus or Profinet installation (known as ET 200M stations). You can not use S7-400 I/O modules in the rack for that type of configuration. This information is very clear from the already suggested manual, and the already attached image from the first reply to your question. Now, why are S7-400 I/O modules more expensive? I believe you already had a good answer from our friend mopS04. The PLC families are different, S7-400 modules are larger, designed to connect to a S7-400 backplane connector, more robust, with faster reaction times than their S7-300 counterparts, whereas S7-300 modules use a simple U-connector to connect to the PLC, are smaller and less robust, etc... Consider also that the S7-400 PLCs were always considered high-end automation systems, designed to control complete plants whereas the S7-300 were sold as middle-level PLCs, for smaller projects, at the machine level: So basically, as in any commercial endeavour, the S7-400 CPUs and I/O modules are more expensive because clients were willing to pay that price to obtain what they needed in their projects. To have a description of all digital and analog I/O modules in the two CPU families, look at the following documents: SIMATIC S7-300 S7-300 Module data https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/8859629 SIMATIC S7-400 S7-400 Automation System Module Data https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/1117740 Hope this helps, Daniel Chartier |
Last edited by: dchartier at: 1/15/2019 3:09:36 PMLast edited by: dchartier at: 1/15/2019 3:57:26 PM |
|
This contribution was helpful to1 thankful Users |
1/15/2019 3:20 PM | |
Posts: 25 Rating: (0) |
Please really I want to buy 414-5H or 416-5H and I want to know all data about this subject So if we want redundancy in each thing (cpu, I/O module , etc) we should buy s7-300 I/O module and we cannot use s7-400 I/O module? Please tell me as soon as possible |
1/15/2019 3:55 PM | |
Joined: 3/5/2014 Last visit: 8/5/2022 Posts: 5521 Rating: (1054)
|
hi, I guess the best for your is when you contact your local Siemens technical consulting support. They will have a look at your project and can offer you the best solution for your needs. Have a look into the contact-database. regards, |
FCK WAR! |
|
1/15/2019 6:06 PM | |
Posts: 25 Rating: (0) |
But I just asked an easy question Is it possible to get S7-400 I/O modules and front connector to the redundant 416-5H PLCs? Or we must use s7-300 I/O modules and front connector to them? |
Follow us on