SiePortal

The integrated platform for your product selection, buying and support workflow - bringing together Industry Mall and Online Support.

Products & Services
- Menu temporary not available
- Menue temporary not available
- {{item.title}}
Support Support
{{(apiData.Support | filter:{'rank':1}:true)[0].title}} Support
- Menu temporary not available
- Menue temporary not available
- {{item.title}}
MySiePortal MySiePortal
{{(apiData.MySiePortal | filter:{'rank':1}:true)[0].title}} MySiePortal
- Menu temporary not available
- Menue temporary not available
- {{item.title}}
Cart ({{apiData.CartCount}})

Navigation

Which CEMAT Standard ?

4/11/2010 10:45 AM	Rate (0)
Navnag Platinum Member Joined: 11/21/2007 Last visit: 7/25/2025 Posts: 2326 Rating: (309)	Hi all We need to follow the attached drive control philosophy in one of our projects using CEMAT V7.0. We found the default standard "000" - Normal closest to our requirements and worked on that. However in this standard we cannot meet some of client's requirements e.g. Local control from individual drive faceplate. Is it possible to modify the default standard to suit our requirements, ir should we use a different standard to meet these specifications ? Thanks & Regards Navnag Attachment Control_Philosophy.PDF (160 Downloads)
	There is no such thing as the last bug in a program There are no stubborn bugs, There are only stubborn Debuggers.
Suggestion To thank Quote Answer

4/11/2010 5:33 PM	Rate (0)
Phlip Posts: 30 Rating: (0)	Hi, it's long time i've not used CEMAT. I suggest you to use "Individual Mode" as your "Local" Mode. If you have on-field selector to switch-on your local mode, you can use it on the C_Group block to change group mode. Then use the position of the on-field switch as condition for your interlocks so that you can control and monitor your blocks as in Individual (through the faceplate). I hope to be helpfull.
Phlip Posts: 30 Rating: (0)
Suggestion To thank Quote Answer

Share this page:

Share this page on...